Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Basak Eraydin vs Lena Papadakis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Eraydin vs Papadakis analysis and find out who is favored!
Basak Eraydin vs Lena Papadakis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Eraydin 1 - 0 Papadakis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eraydin has won 46.08% of points on their second serve, while Papadakis has won 50.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eraydin, in recent form, has won 62.03% of their opponent's second serve points, while Papadakis has won 57.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.79% and 40.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eraydin has saved 51.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Papadakis has saved 54.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eraydin has won 68.57% of matches played (W/L 24/ 11), with Papadakis winning 53.33% (W/L 24/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eraydin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 171/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Papadakis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 24/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Eraydin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 22/ 8), where as Papadakis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.89% of matches (W/L 22/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eraydin winning 1 times and Papadakis being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Eraydin winning 2 and Papadakis winning 0. The last match between Eraydin and Papadakis was at the Aschaffenburg, 04-07-2018, First, Clay with Basak Eraydin getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Eraydin and Papadakis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Eraydin winning 0 times and Papadakis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Eraydin winning 0, and Papadakis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eraydin has played against opponents with an average rank of 204 while Papadakis has played against players with an average rank of 244.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eraydin has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Papadakis has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eraydin has converted 52.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Papadakis has converted 49.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
799
Rank
156
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
513
Rank
250
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
59% (392-268)
Career Total W/L
55% (217-176)
69% (18-8)
YTD W/L
63% (15-9)
$83,129
Career Prize Money
$9,509
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Basak Eraydin | Lena Papadakis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (36/58) | 61% (34/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (27/36) | 59% (20/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (11/22) | 36% (8/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (28/56) | 34% (20/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Basak Eraydin
Player
Lena Papadakis
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Basak Eraydin | Lena Papadakis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (18/8) | 63% (15/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (37/18) | 63% (36/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (275/193) | 56% (283/220) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 67% (6/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 72% (18/7) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 52 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:48 | 1:38:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 169.38 | 244.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (860/1418) | 67% (1116/1660) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (503/860) | 62% (688/1116) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (259/558) | 49% (268/544) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (116/219) | 50% (117/236) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (762/1451) | 49% (828/1698) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 63% (15/9) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (18/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (18/26) | 65% (15/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (18/18) | 79% (19/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (18/0) | 16% (19/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Basak Eraydin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aspen Schuman
Player
Basak Eraydin
63%
(
70 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alena Kovackova
Player
Basak Eraydin
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Samira De Stefano
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Sandra Alonso
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rositsa Dencheva
Player
Basak Eraydin
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Radka Zelnickova
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Alina Granwehr
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
44%
(
38 of
86)
6
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
9
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Marina Lubsheva
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Basak Eraydin
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Dia Evtimova
39%
(
12 of
31)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Lena Papadakis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Lena Papadakis
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Sarah-Rebecca Sekulic
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katerina Tsygourova
Player
Lena Papadakis
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 7-6(5) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Giada Ciampa
36%
(
9 of
25)
1st Serve %
57%
(
17 of
30)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
94%
(
15 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
4%
(
1 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
7
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Lena Papadakis
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Aneta Kladivova
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Zoe Kaegi
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Lena Papadakis
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Sofia Milatova
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Ana Petkovic
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Eraydin Vs Papadakis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
